4 Ways to Presume the Potential of Non- or Minimally Speaking Students

*This article is adapted from the upcoming book An Educator’s Guide to AAC by Howard Shane and Leigh Anne White (available in April 2026).

Presuming potential is believing an individual can learn and has the ability to grow. Acknowl­edging that everyone can learn new skills and develop existing skills encourages the creation of an environment that fosters growth for non- and minimally speaking learners.

But while everyone has the potential to learn new skills, growth isn’t guaranteed without a conscious effort to modify the environment and provide supports. In the context of working with learners who are non- and minimally speaking, presuming potential encompasses four important points we’ll outline here.

Incorporate Dynamic Assessment to Develop Attainable Goals

A dynamic assessment approach—that is, informally assessing learners’ skills by comparing their performance with and without support—is an integral part of presuming potential. That’s because the strengths of learners who are non- and minimally speaking are generally not adequately captured by standardized assessment instruments. Dynamic assessment can offer you what standardized assessments can’t: specific guidance for supporting an individual student.

Dynamic assessment aligns with presuming potential because ongoing assessment acknowledges incremental gains significant to the individual and their communication and language pro­file. For example, while a student’s score on a standardized measure may remain stable or comparable over a 6-month period, a dynamic assessment may highlight critical small gains, such as their ability to consistently understand commands containing personally rel­evant nouns when paired with visual cues. Presuming potential requires dynamic assessment to inform the intervention steps that will support growth over time.

See An Educator’s Guide to AAC for practical guidance on assessing speech, language, and communication for learners who are non- or minimally speaking.

Identify the Learner’s Zone of Proximal Development

The zone of proximal development, proposed by the renowned psychologist Lev Vygotsky (1962), refers to the difference between what a person can achieve independently and what they can achieve with support (e.g., through effective modeling or scaffolding). More specifically, the term proximal indicates that the individ­ual is close to mastering the skill independently. Understanding a learner’s zone of proxi­mal development recognizes that learning something new is usually possible with appropriate support.

Presume the Ability to Learn or Expand Upon Symbolic Communication

Symbolic commu­nication allows communication to convey a message without additional interpretation from communication partners. It’s a crucial way to support an individual’s overall quality of life.

At a simple level, using a graphic symbol to represent a preferred object to replace physically bringing a communication partner to a desired object can lead to significant gains in symbolic communication over time. But intervention should always be directed toward a higher level of symbolic communication, assum­ing that doing so will ultimately provide the learner with the means to convey more complex ideas and thoughts. If a learner demonstrates an understanding of one symbolic level, presume they are capable of transitioning to the next, more abstract level with the help of targeted instruction.

See An Educator’s Guide to AAC for guidance on advancing symbolic communication.

Always Incorporate Language Arts Instruction

Although it may be necessary to first focus on helping students communicate basic needs and wants, it’s also important to include language arts instruction. It’s estimated that up to 90% of learners who use AAC enter adulthood without the func­tional literacy skills to participate in meaningful work or life activities (Foley & Wolter, 2010).

Language arts instruction involves developing language skills that can improve students’ symbolic knowledge and advance grammatical understanding and use. Literacy instruction must begin with presuming potential, because if potential is not presumed and literacy skills are not taught, they will not readily develop. Learning to read is a developmental progression that incorporates knowledge and skills in a variety of domains, including:

  • Emergent literacy skills
  • Language skills
  • Phonological awareness
  • Letter-sound correspondence
  • Decoding skills
  • Comprehension

As part of AAC system training, many non- or minimally speaking learn­ers are introduced to graphic symbols systems focused on expressive and receptive communication. We firmly believe that the symbolic knowledge that drives the AAC system can also form the basis of a reading program—albeit more symbol-based than text-based.

Many learners who are non- or minimally speaking may not become proficient text-based readers. However, their recognition and use of symbols can be used to support a reading approach that allows them to compose and read words, phrases, and sentences—in this approach, graphic symbols will form the foundation for what is produced or interpreted. In other words, students may experience considerable difficulty with traditional read­ing, but they’re often successful at identifying (and naming) the graphic symbols within their AAC system or other visual supports.

***

Go deeper with the book behind this article! Get practical guidance on nurturing language and communication skills—and improving quality of life—for students with significant communication needs.

COMING SPRING 2026!

An Educator’s Guide to AAC
Supporting Communication and Language Learning

By Howard C. Shane, Ph.D., & Leigh Anne White, M.Ed., M.S., CCC-SLP

Created by AAC pioneer Howard Shane and speech-language pathologist Leigh Anne White, this is the educator’s definitive guide to understanding AAC and improving outcomes for K-12 students who are non- or minimally speaking. Learn best practices for leveraging AAC to boost students’ expressive and receptive communication and language learning competence, with care and respect for each learner’s individual strengths and differences.

Topics
Tags
More posts like this

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post a Comment